San Diego Criminal Defense Attorney
Criminal Defense Practice Areas San Diego Criminal Defense Lawyer Attorney Bio Reviews & Testimonials Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us
DUI
Drug Crimes
Expungements
Internet Crimes
Juvenile Crimes
Theft Crimes
Three Strike Cases
Violent Crimes
Weapon Offenses
White Collar Crimes
Other Criminal Matters
Why Hire Attorney Aaron Hicks?
Read more helpful information
Read more helpful news and posts on our blog
Calculate your blood alcohol level

Penal Code Section 148 Resisting Delaying or Obstructing Officer in San Diego

Penal Code Section 148 Resisting Delaying or Obstructing Officer

When police in San Diego respond to a location for a 911 call, they will often arrest someone for resisting or delaying arrest as a fall back charge under Penal Code 148.  They may be unable to establish probable cause that any other offenses have occurred, but someone at the scene did not pass the "attitude test." 

They may also charge the arrestee with this offense as a secondary offense to the original charge, such as DUI, Domestic Violence if there was any type of struggle and the arrestee was injured.  They will do this to protect themselves against a civil suit, or knowing that the DA will potentially dismiss this charge if the person pleads to the other count.  

If you or someone you know has been arrested and/or charged with Penal Code 148 in San Diego, contact the Law Offices of Aaron T. Hicks today for a free consultation at (619) 940-5566 or aaron@athlaw.com

Resisting, Delaying, or Obstructing Officer

148.  (a) (1) Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined in Division 2.5 (commencing with Section 1797) of the Health and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

(2) Except as provided by subdivision (d) of Section 653t, every person who knowingly and maliciously interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes with the transmission of a communication over a public safety radio frequency shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

(b) Every person who, during the commission of any offense described in subdivision (a), removes or takes any weapon, other than a firearm, from the person of, or immediate presence of, a public officer or peace officer shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year or in the state prison.

(c) Every person who, during the commission of any offense described in subdivision (a), removes or takes a firearm from the person of, or immediate presence of, a public officer or peace officer shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison.

(d) Except as provided in subdivision (c) and notwithstanding subdivision (a) of Section 489, every person who removes or takes without intent to permanently deprive, or who attempts to remove or take a firearm from the person of, or immediate presence of, a public officer or peace officer, while the officer is engaged in the performance of his or her lawful duties, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year or in the state prison.

In order to prove a violation of this subdivision, the prosecution shall establish that the defendant had the specific intent to remove or take the firearm by demonstrating that any of the following direct, but ineffectual, acts occurred:

(1) The officer's holster strap was unfastened by the defendant.

(2) The firearm was partially removed from the officer's holster by the defendant.

(3) The firearm safety was released by the defendant.

(4) An independent witness corroborates that the defendant stated that he or she intended to remove the firearm and the defendant actually touched the firearm.

(5) An independent witness corroborates that the defendant actually had his or her hand on the firearm and tried to take the firearm away from the officer who was holding it.

(6) The defendant's fingerprint was found on the firearm or holster.

(7) Physical evidence authenticated by a scientifically verifiable procedure established that the defendant touched the firearm.

(8) In the course of any struggle, the officer's firearm fell and the defendant attempted to pick it up.

(e) A person shall not be convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) in addition to a conviction of a violation of subdivision (b), (c), or (d) when the resistance, delay, or obstruction, and the removal or taking of the weapon or firearm or attempt thereof, was committed against the same public officer, peace officer, or emergency medical technician.. A person may be convicted of multiple violations of this section if more than one public officer, peace officer, or emergency medical technician are victims.

(f) This section shall not apply if the public officer, peace officer, or emergency medical technician is disarmed while engaged in a criminal act.

(Amended Sec. 8, Ch. 853, Stats. 1999. Effective January 1, 2000.)

Categories: Criminal Defense
110 W. C Street, Suite 1300, San Diego California 92101
Attorney Web Design

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.